Design-build consolidates design and construction responsibility under one contract, offering benefits in speed and accountability. But this structure also eliminates some traditional owner protections that require alternative approaches.

Quality oversight becomes more critical. In design-bid-build, the designer has contractual incentive to ensure the contractor follows specifications. In design-build, that natural tension doesn't exist. Owners need independent quality oversight.

Scope definition before award is essential. Design-build contracts often include performance specifications rather than detailed drawings. Ambiguity in performance requirements can lead to disputes about what's included in the contract price.

Change order evaluation requires different approaches. When the design-builder proposes changes, they're essentially evaluating their own design. Independent review helps ensure changes are necessary and fairly priced.

Progressive design-build introduces additional considerations. In this approach, design development continues after contractor selection. Owners need clear processes for scope validation and GMP establishment as design evolves.